Being a Writer in the 21st Century

It’s been a long time since I’ve checked in here.  I was drawn back by a recent comment on an (very) old blog post that reminded me, “oh yeah! I used to write a blog.”  That recollection has taken me down a long and windy road of recollections – most about how I “used to be” a writer and how important writing “used to be” to me and, “wait. Where the hell am I?”

It’s not that this is the first time I’ve walked away from writing.  Most of my adult life has been a cycle of heavily focused creative work and long periods of wandering through the desert of “real” life only to find myself back at the altar of the pen (or, for me, the keyboard). But this last excursion away from writing has been different – mostly, I think, because it coincided with my decision to leave teaching.  Many writers also teach. And my path has not been anything extraordinary or unique.  I started writing seriously in my early twenties – went to college – honed my craft – took a teaching gig and began the oh-so-common plight of the writer who teaches/the teacher who writes.  (Where to find the time???).  And though I left teaching to focus more heavily on my writing and to attempt to transition into the editing world – somewhere along the line I got lost.  And this has me thinking about the subtitle of this blog: being a writer in the 21st century.

I’d like to say that things have changed from the days of Erica Jong’s pronouncement that she “sometimes feel[s] guilty writing poems when [she] should be cooking.” And though we as women have, I believe, mostly dealt with our guilt over not cooking and cleaning enough (or at all) – we, as writers, still struggle with feelings of guilt when writing.  Stupid, really.  I mean, when I put it out there on the page like that – my immediate impulse is to delete it.  But, darn it, it’s true!  I have spent the past year working on a project that – somewhere inside of me – seemed “legitimate.”  A year.  That’s a year that could have – and should have – been spent writing the memoir I started two (god help me!) years ago.  But I didn’t.  I didn’t for a couple of reasons:

1. Memoir writing is hard and emotionally challenging and, quite frankly, I’m terrified of it.

2. (And more importantly, I think) I didn’t feel that I was being “productive” (whatever that means) when I was spending hours a day sitting at my computer writing.  I had left teaching.  I needed a CAREER.

It’s all bulls#@t, really. And maybe it’s all just an elaborate excuse that I created for myself because of reason #1 (that’s totally possible).  But I see other friends, who are also writers, struggling with the same issues.  And I’m starting to think that this is a larger issue – one that speaks to the very core of what it means to be a writer in the 21st century. I think it means a genuine struggle with purpose and validation, with focus and the need to “justify” ourselves. I think, for me at least, it means leaving and returning and leaving and returning again – I think it takes that kind of circling, that kind of righteous insistence from whatever it is inside of us that calls us to write, to pry our eyes open and force them to focus on the one and only thing that, for whatever reason, makes us who we are: writers.

Ask Me If I Care

So. I received this comment from a, apparently, “former” blog follower:

It seems as though you are a professional student rather than a professional writer with a PHD. Sadly I must drop you from my watch list since it’s simply impossible to know where and what you are going to be doing next. I’m not fond of following such chaotic career choices which detracts from the works of any professional individual. It must give your followers fits! I have always found your work and thoughts engaging but as you continually leap from organization to organization I regret I will no longer consider your work relevant. I certainly wish you good fortune in your career and perhaps one day I will find your work worth pursuing again.

I wonder what, exactly, I’m meant to take from this. I mean, clearly Mike D. disapproves. And you’d think this blog had been devoted to post after post of all the dirty little details of my “chaotic career choices.”  Only thing is, I’m pretty certain I’ve written about nothing but the writing life – with the exception of the last post that attempted to explain why I’d been so absent for so long. And I’m also pretty certain working three jobs (simultaneously, I might add) in the publishing industry does not qualify as “chaotic.”

Perhaps Mike D. needed further explanation that my “leap[ing] from organization to organization” was, in fact, out of my control and that I had been volunteering at these organizations to help them out with specific projects that – eventually, as all special projects do – ended. Perhaps he missed the note that indicated that I have, in fact, been working on my memoir during this time as well and am planning to share pieces of it with you.  Perhaps Mike D. just had a bad day and needed to vent.  In any case, I suspect Mike D. could have simply stopped following my blog and taken me off his “watch list” without any need for snarky commentary at all. But I suppose one asks for such unwanted personal criticism when one enters the blogosphere. I suppose I could take his commentary to heart and go out and dedicate my life to one soul-sucking endeavor and give up this whole idea of trying to find a place in the publishing world that also allows room for my own writing. Yes, I suppose I could do that. If I cared at all about what Mike D. had to say about my life. Which, of course, now that I’ve gotten that off my chest, I don’t.

Wow. That Was a Long Break.

Okay. So I know I told you (last May!) that I would be slowing things down on the blog front. I guess what really happened is I quit blogging altogether. It’s not surprising, really. In June I took over as the new President of VOX Press, an independent nonprofit that publishes avant-garde literature. At approximately the same exact moment, I began developing a relationship with the Creative Nonfiction Foundation and found myself doing odd jobs for them as well. I guess you could say, things got busy.

Continue reading

AngelSpeak. Stripped.

Dear friends,

I started this blog last year as an experiment, as a discipline; and what I hoped to gain from a commitment to daily posting, I am happy to report, I have gained. I found my writing legs. Nothing could have kick started me back into writing better than striving to maintain this blog. There were many, many days (months, really) when the only thing I wrote the entire day was a blog post. Now? Well, now I have so much to write that blog posts fall to the bottom of the priority list and, more often than not it seems, don’t get written at all. For this, I am enormously grateful.

Continue reading

P&W Prompt 18: Dear Me at Thirty,

This week’s Poets & Writers‘ prompt:

Think back to yourself ten years ago–where you lived, what your preoccupations were, who your relationships were with, who you were. Write a letter in the form of a poem to yourself then from yourself now.

I had the most ridiculously hard time writing this thing. And even now, three days into it, I have nothing. Nix. Nil. Nada. Bupkis. Maybe it’s because I’m approaching another decade (40, here we come!) and ten years ago I was doing the same – but I just cannot seem to write this thing. Here’s what I started out with:

Continue reading

MFA Programs: The Eternal (God Help Us) Debate

So, I’m reading Mark McGurl‘s piece in the Los Angeles Review of Books, “The MFA Octopus: Four Questions About Creative Writing,” and I’m thinking: aren’t we done with this yet? I mean, haven’t we all heard the many arguments both for and against the MFA program? And what is all this debate and discussion getting us anyway?

Continue reading

The Author Bio (Sigh)

Edan Lepucki bemoans the struggle that is writing the author bio in her piece for The Millions titled “MFA Grads and Former Acrobats: Approaches to the Author Bio.” In it, she questions the growing trend in bios that seem to mention everything about the author except what he or she has accomplished in the literary world. We’ve all seen them. Just scanning the bios of the latest edition of the Oxford American gives us a pretty good picture of how far afield the author bio has gone:

Continue reading